<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Socioeconomic status just does not work as a proxy for race.</title>
	<link>http://www.michiganindependent.com/2006/11/06/socioeconomic-status-just-does-not-work-as-a-proxy-for-race/</link>
	<description>The University of Michigan's Progressive News &#38; Views Magazine</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.michiganindependent.com/2006/11/06/socioeconomic-status-just-does-not-work-as-a-proxy-for-race/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.michiganindependent.com/2006/11/06/socioeconomic-status-just-does-not-work-as-a-proxy-for-race/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Why does looking at socioeconomic status not produce the same diversification as looking at race? I think that this is a fundamental question to ask because in this statement you are basically saying that here's this outcome, therefore this is the cause. This is a pretty powerful simplification that doesn't hold up under scrutiny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does looking at socioeconomic status not produce the same diversification as looking at race? I think that this is a fundamental question to ask because in this statement you are basically saying that here&#8217;s this outcome, therefore this is the cause. This is a pretty powerful simplification that doesn&#8217;t hold up under scrutiny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
